^^^^^This is pretty true^^^^^
Also E will lower fuel economy and if not tuned for the fuel it can actually lose power in some cases.
These cars from the oem is tuned to make more power and run best on higher octane lower E fuel. Lower octane and/or higher E fuels will not perform as well. The ecu is limited on how much it can adjust for octane and E content but can be ran on 87 in some cases or E fuels in some cases. Why hyundai said 87 is fine in these cars I'm not sure other than not trying to deter sales.
Right. Addition of ethanol does one of two things depending on the bias of the ECU, especially in actual flex fuel vehicles. It will either improve performance by adding more fuel which results in lower fuel economy (which is how my ECU reacted by default) or it will hurt performance by not adding extra fuel and will result in maintaining about the same fuel economy or maybe a slight gain, but the economy benefit is mostly just that it is a cheaper fuel. This is the bias of a lot of Ford Flex Fuel vehicles, which is why a lot of Ford guys will tell you Flex Fuel is the worst thing ever meanwhile the Nissan guys find themselves doing accidental burnouts. Lol
I agree that Hyundai probably said 87 to not deter sales. It’s amazing how many people will say “oh, I gotta put premium in it??” and change their mind on a car. My old Ridgeline was kinda the same thing.Honda said it can use 87 but “it is recommended to use 89 or 91 for improved performance when towing”.
Using 87 wont really cause any harm, it’s just leaving power unused to save a few bucks.